Legal Opinion

Merritt v. One Package of Merchandise

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 27, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

Three of the proceedings above named are proceedings in rem, instituted by Israel J. Merritt, against a quantity of merchandise, being part of the cargo of the steam-ship Oregon, which steamer, having-been in collision, was sunk in the sea outside the territorial limits of the United States, and was there abandoned. The cargo in question was, by means of divers, rescued from the steamer as she lay on the bottom in deep water of the sea, and was brought by the libelant into the port of New York. No owner appeared to claim the property, nor was the owner known. These proceedings were therefore…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The Bello Corrunes. The Spanish ConsulSupreme Court of the United States · 1821

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. 1,150½ Pounds of CelluloidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  2. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  3. Albury v. Cargo of the LuganoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1913
  4. The LuganoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API