Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. Ewald

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1923No. 18266PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Thurston county, Wilson, J., entered July 2, 1923, granting plaintiff a new trial, after a nominal verdict for plaintiff in an action for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Frances Woodruff, seeks recovery of damages from the defendant, Mark Ewald, *62for personal injuries suffered by her, as sbe claims, as the result of the negligent driving of the automobile of the defendant, causing it to collide with an automobile in which she was riding, at a street intersection in the city of Olympia. A trial in the superior court for Thurston county, sitting with a jury, resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding her nominal recovery in the sum of five dollars. The plaintiff thereupon timely made a motion for a new trial, one of the grounds of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Halverson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. McBroom v. OrnerWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Halverson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. MacOmber v. HaysWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API