Conant v. First National Bank
Indiana Supreme Court
From Hamilton Circuit Court; Meade Vestal, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Peru against Edward T. Conant and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590..)
1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.
Appellee bank recovered a judgment on a promissory note. The errors relied on for reversal and properly assigned are: First, that the trial court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action and *571that this court acquired no jurisdiction by the appeal; secondly, that the court erred in overruling appellants’ demurrer to the complaint; thirdly, that the court erred in overruling appellants’ motion in arrest of judgment; and fourthly, that the court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial.
It appears from the complaint that the note in suit was executed to the Brown…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boor v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Eckert v. BinkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Harris v. Randolph County BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Vannoy v. DuprezIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Yazel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Page v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
- Grider v. ScharfIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- Kirschbaum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- FERRIS REALTY CO. v. ABCO Signs, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
- Strecker v. StreckerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.