Legal Opinion

Young v. Germania Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 19, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Claim. Before Judge Ellis. Eulton superior court. March 31, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. The act of 1871 (Acts 1871-2, pp. 57, 59) provides that all executions issued from the city court of Atlanta shall be directed “to the sheriff, or his deputy, of the city court of Atlanta, and. all and singular the sheriffs, or their deputies, of the State of Georgia,, and may be levied on all the property of the defendants throughout, the State; but the sheriff, or his deputy, of said city court may levy all such executions on property within any part of the county of Fulton.” It also provides that “the clerk and sheriff, and their deputies, of the superior court of Fulton county shall be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Atlantic Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Byars v. CurrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Buchanan v. SterlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  4. Broach v. O'NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Rucker v. Tabor & AlmandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank v. FortCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  2. Young v. Germania Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Young v. Germania Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API