Legal Opinion

Yalanzon v. Gilbert

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1977No. 53824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Yalanzon, the appellant, was the defendant in a negligence suit. Twice a jury has returned a verdict in his favor, and twice the trial court has granted the plaintiffs motion for a new trial. From the grant of the second motion Yalanzon appeals. Granting or denying a new trial in the first instance is left largely to the trial court’s discretion; however, when a new trial is granted after successive identical verdicts the presumption of legality weakens. Ansley v. Atlantic C. L. R. Co., 86 Ga. App. 152, 155 (71 SE2d 434). It is the policy of the law not to interfere with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dethrage v. City of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Ansley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Brinegar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Chambliss v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API