Gomez v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, Judge.
Arandu Arroyo Gomez appeals from his conviction and sentence and the denial of his motion for new trial. We affirm.
1. He first contends the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. However, other than twice reciting the evidence presented at trial, word-for-word (totaling 28 pages of the brief), Gomez offers no explanation whatsoever of how he contends the evidence was insufficient. He also fails to support this enumeration with argument or citation of authority, as required by Court of Appeals Rule 25 (a) (3), and therefore the enumeration is deemed abandoned. See Court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Levine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Garza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Purvis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- LOVE v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019