Legal Opinion

Snow Et Ux. v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1924No. Appeals, 130 and 131PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Mrs. Snow, a passenger occupying a seat in defendant’s street car on a winter night, was injured by the explosion of a bottle of coffee which the motorman had put on the radiator under the seat. The court submitted to the jury whether the motorman was negligent in placing the bottle there and the jury returned verdicts for Mrs. Snow and her husband. Judgment for defendant n. o. v. was entered on the ground that there was no proof that the “motorman’s act was done within the scope of his agency and authority on the defendant’s business.” That conclusion is here for review.

As…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Greb v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Artherholt v. Erie Electric Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Durando v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Gaussman v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Diffenderfer v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Brien v. Public Service Taxi Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API