Paramo v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATTERSON, Presiding Judge.
In this special action review of an Industrial Commission decision, the petitioner-employee (“claimant”) argues that the award by the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) was not supported by reasonable evidence. Specifically, he argues that the job of lettuce taper was not suitable and was not reasonably available to him. For the following reasons, we find that the job was suitable and reasonably available and affirm the award.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The claimant was employed by the respondent employer, Salyer American Fresh (“Sal-yer”), as a field…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Schnatzmeyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Zimmerman v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Germany v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Holding v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kelly Services v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Giboo v. Certified Transmission RebuildersNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Manone v. mj/cincinnatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017