Legal Opinion

People v. Vanderhall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant *656from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau Count (Harrington, J.), rendered October 9, 1985, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial by the court’s Sandoval ruling which permitted questioning about several prior larceny convictions and a conviction for attempted criminal possession of stolen property, at the defendant’s trial for grand larceny. Initially we note that there is no automatic bar to questioning a defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. IrrizariNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People v. BasirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. TrilliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. CorreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. HolbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API