Child v. Ogden State Bank
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
This is an original proceeding on the part of plaintiffs for a writ of prohibition against defendants. Upon application an alternative writ issued. To the complaint or application for the writ and the writ of prohibtion the defendants interposed a demurrer and a motion to quash. Simultaneously therewith the defendants also answered. The motion to quash is general and upon the ground of insufficient facts. The demurrer specifies two issues:(1) “That this court has no jurisdiction to issue the writ under the circumstances set forth in the complaint and alternative writ,” and (2)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- St. Paul Trust Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Oldroyd v. McCreaUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- Cooper v. Utah Light & Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parkinson v. State Bank of Millard CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- In Re Liquidation of Ogden State BankUtah Supreme Court · 1934