Legal Opinion

Child v. Ogden State Bank

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1933No. 5392PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

This is an original proceeding on the part of plaintiffs for a writ of prohibition against defendants. Upon application an alternative writ issued. To the complaint or application for the writ and the writ of prohibtion the defendants interposed a demurrer and a motion to quash. Simultaneously therewith the defendants also answered. The motion to quash is general and upon the ground of insufficient facts. The demurrer specifies two issues:(1) “That this court has no jurisdiction to issue the writ under the circumstances set forth in the complaint and alternative writ,” and (2)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. St. Paul Trust Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Oldroyd v. McCreaUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Cooper v. Utah Light & Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parkinson v. State Bank of Millard CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  2. In Re Liquidation of Ogden State BankUtah Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API