Legal Opinion

Rodney Kiemele v. Soo Line Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1996No. 95-3700Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 95-3700 RODNEY KIEMELE; LILLIAN KIEMELE,* * Plaintiffs - Appellants * * Appeal from the United States vs. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, * * Defendant - Appellee * Submitted: June 10, 1996 Filed: August 20, 1996 Before BEAM and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,* Senior District Judge. BOGUE, Senior District Judge. Rodney and Lillian Kiemele appeal the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of their negligence action. Because we find that genuine issues of material fact exist, we reverse and remand. *The HONORABLE ANDREW W. BOGUE,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Gerald L. ALLEN, Appellant, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API