Legal Opinion

Barton v. The Proctor & Gamble Company

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided March 28, 2023No. 1:22-cv-00051Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION TERESA BARTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:22-CV-00051 JAR ) THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY ) et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion to remand, (Doc. No. 54), Defendant D-W Tool, Inc.’s (“Wahlco”) motion to dismiss for fraudulent joinder, (Doc. No. 29), and Defendant the Proctor & Gamble Company’s (“P&G”) motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 42). The motions are fully briefed and ready for disposition. For the following reasons, the motion to remand will be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Onepoint Solutions, Llc, a Georgia Limited Liability Company v. Michael Borchert William CatuzziCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Prempro Products Liability Litigation v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Undray D. Ford, Etc. v. Ernie ElsburyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API