Legal Opinion

Gabel v. Kilgore

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 14, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRELL, J.:

The bill of complaint prayed to impress a trust on certain lots of land in Orlando, Florida, purchased by appellee at the instance of appellant. The point in controversy is whether Kilgore bought the lots as the agent of Gabel or for himself and Gabel, with the understanding that they would be divided between them. The Chancellor found that the evidence did not preponderate in favor of the complainant and dismissed the bill.

We think the Chancellor applied a wrong rule of law to the evidence. It is ample to show that Kilgore made a contract with Gable to purchase the lots.

In Ahern…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Hunt, Et Ux. v. CovingtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Ahern v. Florida Real Estate Commission Ex Rel. O'KelleySupreme Court of Florida · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lalow v. CodomoSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Foulk v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Trafalgar Developers, Ltd. v. GENEVA INVEST. LTD.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. Llera Realty, Inc. v. BD. OF REAL ESTATEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Murphy v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API