Legal Opinion

Shanghai Xuanni Technology Co., Ltd. v. City Pocket Los Angeles, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 13, 2023No. 2:20-cv-07467Unknown

1Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-07467-ODW-AFM Document 138 Filed 02/13/23 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:985 O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 SHANGHAI XUANNI TECHNOLOGY Case № 2:20-cv-07467-ODW (AFMx) CO., LTD., 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 Plaintiff, MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 14 DEFAULT JUDGMENT [102] v. 15 16 CITY POCKET LOS ANGELES, INC. et al., 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff Shanghai Xuanni Technology Co., Ltd. moves for entry of default 22 judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 55 against Defendants 23 Morad Matian and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Adriana International Corp. v. ThoerenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Lloyd R. HaggertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API