Pittman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of child molestation and appeals.
1. Appellant contends the trial court erred by denying his motion in limine which sought to prevent the State from introducing evidence of a similar transaction. The basis of the motion was the State’s failure to notify the defendant at least ten days prior to trial that it intended to introduce such evidence, as required by Rule 31.1 of the Uniform Rules of Superior Court. See 235 Ga. 853. The State argued then and now that the evidence of similar transactions falls within the exception to Rule 31.1 set forth in Rule…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Momon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Bowman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Nolton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.