Monmouth County Board of Social Services ex rel. State of Florida v. Lohman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
ASHBEY, J.A.D.
This appeal raises the question of New Jersey’s duty as a responding state respecting an initiating state’s claim for welfare reimbursement under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA),1 N.J.S.A. 2A:4-30.24 et seq., when a previous New Jersey court order terminated defendant’s support obligation for violations of defendant’s visitation rights. We conclude that New Jersey has a duty to establish and to enforce a reimbursement order using RURESA guidelines. N.J.S.A. 2A:4-30.41, 30.46.
Pursuant to RURESA, the State…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daly v. DalySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Franklin v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Parivash v. YousefNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- ESSEX COUNTY ADJUSTER ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. BrookesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Essex Cty. Welfare Div. v. SimonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Contra Costa County ex rel. Tuazon v. CaroHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
- Ross v. McNasbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Damico v. DamicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994