Legal Opinion

Monmouth County Board of Social Services ex rel. State of Florida v. Lohman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 5, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ASHBEY, J.A.D.

This appeal raises the question of New Jersey’s duty as a responding state respecting an initiating state’s claim for welfare reimbursement under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA),1 N.J.S.A. 2A:4-30.24 et seq., when a previous New Jersey court order terminated defendant’s support obligation for violations of defendant’s visitation rights. We conclude that New Jersey has a duty to establish and to enforce a reimbursement order using RURESA guidelines. N.J.S.A. 2A:4-30.41, 30.46.

Pursuant to RURESA, the State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daly v. DalySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Franklin v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Parivash v. YousefNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. ESSEX COUNTY ADJUSTER ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. BrookesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  5. Essex Cty. Welfare Div. v. SimonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Contra Costa County ex rel. Tuazon v. CaroHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Ross v. McNasbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  3. Damico v. DamicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API