Commonwealth v. Kindness
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
Appellant was convicted, after a nonjury trial which he concedes was free of error, of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor.1 This appeal followed. His sole contention is that he was unconstitutionally denied the right to participate in the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition program.
The A.R.D. program was created by the Pénnsylvania Supreme Court in the exercise of its supervisory power over the lower courts. The authorization is found in Pa.R. Crim.P. 175-85, 19 P.S.Appendix. A recent opinion of the United States District Court for the Middle District of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Metropolis Theatre Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Gilles v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Dearborne v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. HernandezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- State v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Cleveland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.