Legal Opinion
LaCONSAY v. Langley
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided January 23, 2009No. 2070999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Judge.
On October 15, 2007, after a convoluted procedural history, the Baldwin Probate Court (“the probate court”) awarded Eli nor Glynn LaConsay 1 and Joseph Wetzel litigation expenses, including attorney fees, pursuant to § 18-lA-232(a), Ala.Code 1975, 2 against Michael Langley. Langley appealed that award to the Baldwin Circuit Court (“the circuit court”). On June 18, 2008, the circuit court entered a summary judgment in favor of Langley, concluding that the litigation expenses had been improperly awarded by the probate court. LaConsay and Wetzel appealed. We reverse and remand.
Backgr…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte Alfab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte EdgarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Gloria Martinez De VOLLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin F. BAILAR, U. S. Postmaster General, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Ex Parte City of IrondaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cadence Bank N.A. v. Goodall-Brown Associates, L.P.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Cadence Bank N.A. v. Goodall-Brown Associates, L.P.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014