Hibbitts v. Robison
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.
(after stating the facts as above). It appeared from testimony heard by the district judge that no appeal was prosecuted from the order of June I, 1925, determining that the new building should be constructed on the “old school site.” Appellants insist that it therefore appeared that the judge was without power to grant the injunction. Appellees, on the other hand, insist it appeared that á majority of the trustees voted in favor of constructing the building on the Sam Moore place, and, therefore, the board of trustees not having power to enforce the will of the majority, that they…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. HemphillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Donna Independent School Dist. v. First State Bank of DonnaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Nance v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Bevers v. WinfreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- South San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. MartineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maxey v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Maxey v. NolandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- St. Line Consol. Sch. v. Farwell Indep.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- State Line Consolidated School Dist. No. 6 v. Farwell Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930