Legal Opinion

Vuegen Technologies Inc v. Cissna

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 10, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-0552Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________ ) ITSERVE ALLIANCE, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 18-2350 (RMC) L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Director, ) United States Citizenship and ) Immigration Services, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________ ) OPINION By tradition and law, the United States has welcomed foreign workers with specialized training to work temporarily in this country as needed by U.S. employers. The workers in specialty occupations do not come as immigrants; they are given visas for three years to work…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API