Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp. v. Langdon

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1981No. 5127-5130Published

1Dissent

McCLINTOCK, Justice, Retired,

dissenting, in which RAPER, Justice, joins.

I disagree with the majority’s handling of this case. They impose upon the Insurance Commissioner the requirement that he take into consideration certain “value factors” which attach to utilization of mortgage guaranty insurance. What this boils down to is that the Commissioner, when reviewing rate structures, must evaluate, consider, and weigh the benefit the citizenry of this state receives from the availability of the insurance against the inequities in the proposed rate structure. Accordingly, if the withdrawal of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API