Legal Opinion

Siriphol v. State, No. Cv 96 0053053 S (Mar. 3, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 3, 1997No. CV 96 0053053 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Both the plaintiffs and defendants move for summary judgment in this petition for a writ of mandamus.

There is no genuine dispute as to the following facts. The plaintiffs, Bounheuang Siriphol and Keomanivanh Sengsavanh, applied for and received a marriage license from the Killingly registrar of vital statistics. Under that license, on November 16, 1992, the plaintiffs were married. The groom, who had previously cohabited with another woman in Laos for more than ten years, learned that this CT…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  3. Hames v. HamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. State v. VolpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. Felson v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API