Legal Opinion

Hills v. Hamilton Watch Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 25, 1918No. 2353Published

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Oliver B. Dickinson, Judge. Suit by Edward R. Hills against the Hamilton Watch Company. From a decree dismissing the bill (248 Fed. 499), plaintiff appeals.

1Per curiam

We do not think it necessary to discuss again the questions that the District Court has already considered at length. 248 Fed. 499. The patent has expired, and nothing is now involved, except the right to an .account. Accordingly we express no opinion concerning laches or validity; it is enough to say that we do not find infringement. On this point we regard the prior art aS limiting the patent so narrowly that the defendant is free to use the two barrels that have been attacked.

The decree is affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hills v. Hamilton Watch Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1918