People v. Weithoff
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from recorder’s court of Detroit. (Chambers, J.) Bespondent was convicted of keeping a gaming room. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
'Montgomery, J.
The respondent was prosecuted under section 2029 of Howell’s Statutes, the information charging that the said respondent did, for hire, gain, and reward, keep and maintain a gaming room, contrary to the provisions of said section. The section reads:
“Any person who shall, for hire, gain, or reward, keep or maintain a gaming room, or a gaming table, or any game of skill or chance, or partly of skill and partly of chance, * * * shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.”
The evidence on the part of the prosecution showed that the respondent occupied and maintained a room, kept a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WeithoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- People v. WynnNew York Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. NeaseOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Engle v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Thrower v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- McBride v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- People v. AntkoviakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.