Legal Opinion
Floyd May v. Sylvia Mahone
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 28, 2017No. 15-3395PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Floyd May, a pro se appellant and an Illinois prisoner, claims in this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that two prison physicians failed to provide constitutionally adequate medical care while treating his non-Hodgkins lymphoma. The district court entered summary judgment for the defendants, and Mr. May has appealed. Before addressing the merits, we must decide whether we have jurisdiction. That question turns on whether Mr. May filed a timely notice of appeal. Because we cannot determine this issue on the existing record, we remand the case to the district court for the limited purpose of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- John Taylor, Jr. v. James BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Thomas Hurlow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Cordell Sanders v. Michael MelvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Craig v. Ontario Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Floyd May v. Sylvia MahoneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Floyd May v. Sylvia MahoneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Kevin Brooking v. Michael BranhamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Norton v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Pollard v. LarsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.