Legal Opinion

Haddad v. Hartford & New York Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 2, 1915Published

Assumpsit. Certified on agreed statement of facts.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.

This case has been certified to this court by the Superior Court upon an agreed statement of facts, as follows:

The plaintiff, at the time of the bringing of the above action at law, was engaged in the business of selling from city to city, various articles, including lace and silk goods.

The defendant at the time aforesaid was engaged in the business of a Common carrier by water and in transporting for hire, freight and passengers from the City of New York, New York, to the City of Providence, Rhode Island.

On June 1, 1913, at said City of New York the plaintiff purchased of the defendant a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Brook v. GaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1874
  3. Hickox v. Naugatuck RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
  4. Chicago & Aurora Railroad v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  5. La BourgogneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API