Production Products Co. v. Vision Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of plaintiffs motion seeking partial summary judgment determining that plaintiff had lawfully terminated a Sales Representative Agreement (Agreement). Pursuant to the Agreement, executed July 1, 1993, defendant was appointed as plaintiffs sales representative in the Midwest. Either party could terminate the Agreement effective at the end of a calendar month upon 60 days’ prior written notice. Commissions would be paid on any order placed before the effective termination date and shipped within 90…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Eagle Comtronics, Inc. v. Pico Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Edison Stone Corp. v. 42nd Street Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Englert v. SchafferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Riccardi v. CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Devany v. Brockway Development, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- McGimpsey v. J. Robert Folchetti & Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Swits v. New York Systems Exchange, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.