Legal Opinion

Washtenaw County v. State Tax Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1983No. Docket Nos. 64939, 64970, 65037PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Burns, J.

Although we join Judge Allen in Issues II, III and IV, we cannot join in Issue I because we do not agree that "usual selling price” necessarily means whatever a buyer pays for property.

Because of extraordinarily high interest rates, some real estate buyers and sellers have recently used different forms of "creative financing” to finance their property sales. Using such financings, a buyer might pay more for a property where the payments are made over an extended number of years than he or she would have if the sale were financed through a conventional mortgage. Although the property’s value…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Township of Pine Grove v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Fisher-New Center Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. East Grand Rapids School District v. Kent County Tax Allocation BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Titus v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Ann Arbor Township v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeals of Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Washtenaw County v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Plymouth Township v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Flint Building Co. v. Kenosha County Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. 3333 Moores River Drive Ass'n v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API