Legal Opinion

Konigsberg v. Scheinman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion by respondent to dismiss petition on objections in point of law granted, and petition dated January 9, 1982 dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not lie to review matters such as the alleged bias or prejudice of a Trial Judge where such matters can be raised on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction (Matter of Lucas v Scheinman, 83 AD2d 969). Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lucas v. ScheinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Corporation of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. GreenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Matter of Peterec-Tolino v. SchickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025