Legal Opinion
APCC Services, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 3, 2003No. CIV.A. 99-0696ESHPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
On March 28, 2003, this Court dismissed claims brought by five of six plaintiffs against AT & T for payment of dial-around compensation allegedly owed to the payphone service providers (“PSPs”) that plaintiffs represent. 1 The Court concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction, finding that plaintiffs lacked Article III standing based on either the assignments executed by the PSPs or the doctrine of associational standing. 2 See APCC Services, Inc. v. AT & T Corp., 254 F.Supp.2d 135 (D.D.C.2003) [hereinafter “APCC I ”]. In response to this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Whelan v. AbellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- APCC Services, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co., LPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk, Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.