Lanahan v. Bailey
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Aldrich, J., Greenville, March, 1898. Action by Wm. Lanahan & Sons v. Emma E. Bailey, trading under the name of the Bailey Liquor Company. From an order refusing to dissolve an attachment, the defendant appeals. cites: 13 Allen, 449; 36 Me., 322; 117 Mass., 591; 16 R. I., 622; 11 A. R;, 298. cite: Code, 253, 256.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
The case contains the following statement of facts: This is an action commenced November 8, 1897, upon an open account for liquors sold by plaintiffs, citizens of Maryland, to defendant, a citizen of Georgia. Amount of account, $1,575. The action was commenced by attachment upon certain stocks of liquors in the possession of J. E. Payne and F. M. Simmons, Greenville, and Cobb & Morris, in Abbeville. In August, 1897, the defendant, who was a large wholesale dealer in liquor in Atlanta, entered into several agreements with the said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
3Cited by5 opinions
- Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co. v. GosnellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- Griste v. BurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
- Ex Parte Neal Loan CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
- Port Sumter Hotel v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Co. v. Greenwood Hardware Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906