Legal Opinion

Sellers v. Carolina Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BeogdeN, J.(1) Was it necessary for the plaintiff to obtain leave of the Federal Court, permitting or allowing this action for wrongful death to be instituted?(2) Does the order appointing the receivers for the Norfolk Southern Eailroad grant such necessary leave or permission?(3) Was there any evidence that J. 0. Poe was agent of the Carolina Eailroad Company at the time the action was instituted, to wit, 14 September, 1932?

U. S. C. A., section 125, provides that “every receiver ... of any property appointed by any court of'the United States may be sued in respect to any act or transaction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Grady v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Lassiter v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Wilson v. Rankin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barber v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API