Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Mann

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1921No. 10,885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Morgan Circuit Court; Alfred M. Bain, Judge. Action by Sophia Mann, administratrix of the estate of Calvin T. Mann, deceased, against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, P. J.

The second paragraph of the fourth amended complaint on which this case was submitted to the jury averred in substance that appellant, a common carrier, employing more than five men,’at the time of the occurrence involved, operated lines .of railroad in and through the city of Indianapolis, and employed appellee’s decedent, Calvin Mann. That certain of its lines of railway track intersect East St. Clair street in said city, which said street extends east and west. Near and at the point where the said street is crossed by the said tracks, it is almost constantly traveled by the public on foot…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HilligossIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Bluedorn v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. Richeson v. Hogmire, Admx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Union Traction Co. v. WynkoopIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API