Legal Opinion

Falls v. . Goforth

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbe appeal presents tbe question wbetber tbe facts bring tbe instant case witbin tbe principle announced in Beck v. Wilkins, 179 N. C., 231, 102 S. E., 312, or tbe rule applied in Morgan v. Bank, 190 N. C., 209, 129 S. E., 585. We tbink tbe case is controlled by tbe decisions in Beck v. Wilkins, supra; Hutchins v. Taylor-Buick Co., 198 N. C., 777, 153 S. E., 397; and Hanes v. Shapiro, 168 N. C., 24, 84 S. E., 33.

Tbe relation of plaintiff and defendant was tbat of bailor and bailee. Ordinarily, tbe liability of a bailee for tbe safe return of tbe thing bailed is made to depend upon tbe…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hanes v. ShapiroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Beck v. Wilkins-Ricks Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Hanes v. . ShapiroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Trustees v. . Banking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Morgan v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Agricultural Ins. v. ConstantineOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Miller's Mut. Fire Ins. Ass'n of Alton, Ill. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Prettyman v. Hopkins Motor Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois v. Atkinson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Vincent v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API