Malone-Watson v. Strategic Restaurants
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1ConcurrenceCrain, J.
hi agree that Strategic proved its entitlement to summary judgment and that he judgment should be affirmed. I write separately to clarify the summary judgment standard and applicable standard of review, and to expressly disagree with the comments made in Footnote 1.
I find no basis for interpreting Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 966(F)(2) to authorize credibility determinations in deciding motions for summary judgment, as is suggested in Footnote 1. After its amendment by Acts 2013, Number 391, Section 1, Article 966(F)(2) pertinently provides that “[ejvidence cited in and attached…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Associated Motors, Inc. v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Holmes v. HendricksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Hutchinson v. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NO. 5747Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Security Credit Corp. v. Menefee Motor Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Edwards v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.