Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Hammonds

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 15, 1937No. 4-4526PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

..McHan'ey, J,

Appellees, being the owners of east half, northeast quarter of section 2, township 4 north, range 11 west, Pulaski county, .sued appellant for damage for cutting, removing and manufacturing into lumber the timber from the north forty of said tract. The complaint alleged that appellant and his agents “willfully, knowingly, wrongfully and without right,” and without the knowledge of appellees, entered upon said land and cut, removed and manufactured into lumber 24,483 feet of timber therefrom of the value of $20 per thousand; and that appellant and his agents, in like manner, cut…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eaton v. LangleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  2. Central Coal & Coke Co. v. John Henry Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  3. Griffith v. Ayer-Lord Tie Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Kansas City Fibre Box Co. v. F. Burkart Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Bradley Lumber Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burbridge v. Bradley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  2. Shamlin v. Quadrangle Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Nutting v. RaubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API