Legal Opinion

People v. Pursley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 26, 2011No. 2-09-0913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman

Presiding Justice Jorgensen and Justice Birkett concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

Defendant, Patrick A. Pursley, appeals the circuit court order that denied his motion for postconviction ballistics testing. Defendant has long pursued postconviction ballistics testing related to the murder of Andrew Ascher, 1 even as the relevant statute has changed. At this time, we grant defendant the relief requested and reverse the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction ballistics testing and remand for further proceedings.

After a jury trial, defendant was found guilty of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SavoryIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. PursleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Wackrow v. NiemiIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. PursleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. SnowAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  2. People v. SnowAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. People v. BarrowAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. People v. RozoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. People v. EnglishAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API