Legal Opinion

Decatur (2004) Realty, LLC v. Cruz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to compel specific performance of a contract to purchase real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Hinds-Radix, J.), dated July 5, 2005, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, they failed to show that they properly demanded performance of a contract to purchase real property on a specific day (see Cave v Kollar, 296 AD2d 370 [2002]). They also failed to show that they had the requisite ability to perform the contract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Cave v. KollarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Paglia v. PisanelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zeitoune v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Chemtob v. Il Padrone Construction II, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Weiss v. FeldbrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API