Legal Opinion
Feild v. Apfel
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided December 31, 1998No. 98-2108 D/APublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REVERSING AND REMANDING THE CLAIMANT’S CASE
DONALD, District, Judge.
Claimant, Adrianne Feild, filed this appeal after being denied disability benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) rendered a ruling against the claimant, and the Appeals Council denied review. The claimant’s case is reversed and remanded to the ALJ for reconsideration based upon the correct education level, and possible use of a vocational expert.
I. BACKGROUND FACTS
The claimant suffers from insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. The claimant maintains that she suffers from…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Danny L. KEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John J. CALLAHAN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.