Legal Opinion

McTigue v. Town of Clarkstown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 1, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the respondents’ determination dated November 24, 2003, which denied the petitioner benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland *375County (Bergerman, J.), dated September 23, 2004, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, he was not entitled to a due process hearing since his General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits were neither revoked nor terminated (see Matter of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gamma v. BloomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Miele v. Town of ClarkstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Cole-Hatchard v. SherwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laird v. Village of Pelham ManorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Schnurr v. Nassau CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API