Legal Opinion
Krukowski v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 2, 2016No. 16-1010PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss; Tort Claims; False Arrest Claim; Constitutional Claims; Proper Defendants; Claim Pending before another Court.
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
Ashton Krukowski, a currently incarcerated pro se plaintiff, seeks relief in this Court for false arrest, constitutional violations, and various tort claims associated with his arrest in February 2016. The Government has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Gerald Alan Brown, and Charles v. Darnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Payne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018