Neidermiller v. Amlong & Amlong, P.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Judge.
We affirm an order denying a motion to vacate a final default judgment foreclosing *759a charging lien. We do not address whether the appellee was entitled to the charging lien initially because appellant’s attack comes too late.
The appellee, a firm of attorneys, represented the appellant in an action in which it filed a notice of charging lien. In July 1987, the court, without objection, reserved jurisdiction to adjudicate charging liens. In September the appellee moved to determine the charging lien. No evidence of a lack of notice exists with respect to this motion and the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Pelz v. City of ClearwaterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- White v. LoschiavoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992