Legal Opinion

Neidermiller v. Amlong & Amlong, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 13, 1990No. 89-0968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

We affirm an order denying a motion to vacate a final default judgment foreclosing *759a charging lien. We do not address whether the appellee was entitled to the charging lien initially because appellant’s attack comes too late.

The appellee, a firm of attorneys, represented the appellant in an action in which it filed a notice of charging lien. In July 1987, the court, without objection, reserved jurisdiction to adjudicate charging liens. In September the appellee moved to determine the charging lien. No evidence of a lack of notice exists with respect to this motion and the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pelz v. City of ClearwaterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. White v. LoschiavoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API