Legal Opinion
Holland v. Sterling Enterprises Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 2, 1985No. 84-1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, James J. Ward, the receiver for the Woodcrest Apartments, Ltd., appeals an order of the district court denying his motion to intervene. We dismiss his appeal.
I
In April 1977, Matthew C. Thompson purchased a limited partnership interest in Woodcrest Apartments, Ltd., (“Woodcrest Apartments”) for $10,000. Between April and September 1977, twenty-four other investors also purchased limited partnership interests in Woodcrest Apartments, bringing the limited partners’ investment to $250,000. Before purchasing their limited partnership interests, Thompson and the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Matter of Baby M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Allen Calculators, Inc. v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John Troelstrup, as Equity Receiver for John M. Tobin v. Index Futures Group, Inc., and Jack Carl/312-Futures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Roy W. Schultz, Advance Transportation Company, a Wisconsin Corporation, Proposed Intervening v. John Connery, IICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Getty Oil Co. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Holland v. Sterling EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Turney, Susan v. City of MellenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2023