Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Shalala
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff moves for reconsideration or clarification of the portion of this Court’s Order dated December 12, 1997, which denied plaintiffs summary judgment motion as to defendants’ liability on the Ninth and Tenth Claims. For the reasons set forth below, that motion is granted.
The Ninth and Tenth claims allege that defendants unlawfully failed to pay plaintiff its contract Support costs (“CSC”) in fiscal year 1996 (“FY 1996”) and thereafter. Pursuant to an internal agency guideline, the ISDM 92-2, the Secretary limited funding for new and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. ShalalaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1997
- Yavapai-prescott Indian Tribe v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by1 opinion
- SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF FORT HALL v. ShalalaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1998