Legal Opinion

United States v. Alejandro-Gonzalez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 20, 2003No. 03-20150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:*

Andres Alejandro-Gonzalez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Alejandro-Gonzalez complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Alejandro-Gonzalez thus contends that his sentence should not exceed the maximum terms of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. DabeitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Chigozie Iwouha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API