Legal Opinion

Ekberg v. Schloss

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1895No. Nos. 9514-(15)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Petition in the district court for Hennepin county in the matter of the assignment of Isaac Ekbefg and others, insolvents, by Nathan Schloss and others, creditors of said insolvents, in their own behalf and in behalf of all other creditors, for leave to participate in the benefits under the assignment without being required to file releases of their respective claims. From an order, Jamison, J., in favor of petitioners, the insolvents appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Petition by certain creditors of the insolvents to be permitted to share in the distribution of their estate without filing releases, as provided in G-. S. 1894, § 4249. The trial court, upon the hearing of the petition, made its order permitting the creditors of the insolvents to share in the distribution of the estate without filing-releases of their respective claims, on the ground that the insolvents gave a preference contrary to law, and had not kept books of account or records from which their true financial condition could be ascertained. From this order they appealed.

1. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Work v. HolmboeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Dunham v. MessingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API