Legal Opinion

Dolly Parker Motors, Inc. v. Stinson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 11, 1952No. 4-9684PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a suit for $255.22, brought by the appellee as plaintiff. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff has a credit in that amount with the defendant, a Ford automobile dealer. The defense is that as a part of an agreed exchange of used vehicles the plaintiff agreed to buy a new Ford from the defendant, and the defendant is entitled to hold the credit for application on the price of a new car when the plaintiff decides to buy one. At the close of the proof the trial court directed a verdict for the plaintiff. In this situation we view the evidence most favorably to the party against whom…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McIllmoil v. Frawley Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Moon Motor Car Co. of New York v. Moon Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arkansas Rock & Gravel Co. v. Chris-T-Emulsion Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. David Mears v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  4. Baker v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Arkansas Rock & Gravel Co. v. Chris-T-Emulsion Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API