Legal Opinion

State Line & Sullivan R. R. v. Lehigh Valley R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1923No. Appeal, No. 243PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

In this suit, tried before the learned president judge of the court below without a jury, plaintiff seeks to re*230cover the sum of $137,056.22, with interest, representing an allowance of five cents per ton on coal shipped over its railroad, which it alleges to be rental due to it, by defendant, on a demise of the railroad to the latter. The answer of defendant is, that the sums of money claimed are rebates, and not rent, and hence they cannot be recovered. This view was adopted by the trial judge and approved by the court in banc; plaintiff, complaining of this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Baer Bros. Mercantile Co. v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Leiper v. Baltimore & Philadelphia RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Easton v. Washington County InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Neshaminy Federation of Teachers v. Neshaminy School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  4. Northern Liberties Gas Co. v. United Gas Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Easton v. Washington County InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API