Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Won Cho, United States of America v. Edward L. Harris, Jr., United States of America v. Patrick Anthony Riggans, United States of America v. Murray Evans Laybhen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1984No. 82-1215Published

1Opinion of the Court

730 F.2d 1260

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Richard WON CHO, Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Edward L. HARRIS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Patrick Anthony RIGGANS, Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Murray Evans LAYBHEN, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 82-1215, 82-1092, 82-1101 and 82-1388.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1982.

Decided April 10, 1984.

Patricia L. Collins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Janet…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API