Legal Opinion

State v. Livengood

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 7, 2010No. COA09-1414PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

The trial court did not err in overruling defendant’s objection to a witness’ answer to a question asked by defense counsel during cross-examination. Defendant can show no prejudice resulting from his trial counsel’s failure to object to questions asked by the State, to certain questions asked by defense counsel, and the failure of defense counsel to object to the trial court’s discretionary ruling that denied the jury’s request for a transcript of certain testimony during its deliberations.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Defendant was indicted for three counts of incest…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. HagansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LivengoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API